Abstract: In her 2018 paper “Pornographic Videogames: A Feminist Examination,” Mari Mikkola argues that pornographic videogames as a category are not problematic or worthy of condemnation from a feminist perspective.  Contra Mikkola , I advance a view which says that pornographic videogames have category-specific features which make them especially disposed to reinforce bad sexual ideology.  I investigate the ways in which art-categories such as medium and genre ascribe value and meaning to contents within depictions.  I then show that both virtual media and pornography have unique expectations from audiences which partly constitute them both as categories.  In the case of pornographic videogames, I argue that part of what constitutes the category is an expectation of harmful or misleading sexual imagery which the audience can have a prescribed interactive engagement with.  I go on to show why the interactive and immersive components of pornographic videogames aid in reinforcing harmful sexual ideology.  I conclude that pornographic videogames, as a category, are worthy of condemnation from a feminist perspective.