|
Sir
Thomas Killigrew
|
Sir
William Davenant |
The Theatre
Companies
The Restoration of King Charles II did not bring back wide spread theatrical
enterprise, rather Charles decided to create a restricted monopoly between
two legitimate theatres. The actor companies raised initially by Michael Mohun
at The Red Bull and John Rhodes at The Cockpit wanted to see a return to pre-Civil
War ways of running the theatres, whereby many companies competed for the
attention of 'a wide and disparate audience.'3
They were, however, disappointed, Charles gave only two patents to
two of his courtiers, all other companies being banned from performance. This
decision by Charles created a period of turbulent legal struggles and disputes
between actors and patentee managers. The structure of this theatrical control,
with two patentees holding the only rights to perform, would remain until
the end of the eighteenth century.
On 21 August 1660 Charles granted Killigrew and Davenant a warrant
to '...erect two companies of players...and to purchase, build, and erect...two
houses or theatres with all convenient rooms and other necessaries thereunto
appertaining, for the representation of tragedies, comedies, plays, operas,
and all other entertainments of that nature...'4
To
view the full warrant please click here.
In the warrant Charles excuses the creation of the monopoly maintaining that
it would prevent 'much matter of profanation and scurrility.' However, David
Thomas suggests that this was not Charles' real reason for creating the monopoly,
the real reason being an intent to reward Sir Thomas Killigrew with the same
honour that Davenant had received from Charles I.5
As a result of this Killigrew's company was soon labelled The King's Company,
Davenant's men were called The Duke's Company.
The Original Duke's Players
Thomas Betterton, Thomas Sheppey, Robert Noakes, James Noakes, Thomas Lovell,
John Mosely, Cave Underhill, Robert Turner and Thomas Lilleston.
The Original King's Players
Michael Mohun, William Wintershall, Robert Shatterall, William Cartwright,
Walter Clun, Charles Hart and Nicholas Burt.
For more information on the actors/actresses please click on this link.
Killigrew, as the first to receive his patent and as the manager of more experienced pre-Civil War actors, was given the rights to all pre-Restoration Plays, even Davenant's own work. Davenant was outraged and soon petitioned the King to remedy the situation. On 12 December 1660 Davenant was given the exclusive rights to nine of Shakespeare's plays; The Tempest, Macbeth, Measure for Measure, Much ado About Nothing, Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Twelfth Night, King Lear and the very successful Henry VIII . He also recovered the rights to all of his own works.
Rivalry
An excellent description of the rivalry between the two companies comes from
a later period, in the following example we see Colley Cibber looking back
on the Restoration:
'These two excellent companies were both prosperous for some few years till
their variety of plays began to be exhausted. Then of course the better actors
(which the King's seem to have been allowed) could not fail of drawing the
greater audiences. Sir William Davenant therefore, master of the Duke's Company,
to make head against their success, was forced to add spectacle mid music
to action; and to introduce a new species of plays, since called dramatic
operas, of which kind were The Tempest, Psyche, Circe,
and others, all set off with the most expensive decorations of scenes and
habits, with the best voices and dancers. This sensual supply of sight and
sound coming in to the assistance of the weaker party, it was no wonder they
should grow too hard for sense and simple nature, when it is considered how
many more people there are that can see and hear than think and judge. So
wanton a change of the public taste therefore began to fall as heavy upon
the King's Company as their greater excellence in action had before fallen
upon their competitors. Of which encroachment upon wit several good prologues
in those days frequently complained.'6
Both companies were ordered to shut during the height of the
plague, June 1665 to December 1666 and both made heavy losses.
In April 1668 Davenant died and the patent and theatre in
Lincoln's Inn Fields passed on to his widow. The actors Betterton and
Harris took over the day-to-day management of the theatre until 1673 when
Davenant's son, Charles Davenant was old enough to take some responsibility.
In the early 1670s both companies invested a great deal of money into constructing
new theatres.
Despite his cunning in obtaining a patent Killigrew was a remarkably incompetent manager and was at constant loggerheads with his actors. His poor management meant he had to bribe some of the more important actors to stay. However, this did not prevent him being appointed Master of Revels in 1673. Davenant was by far the better leader, described by Leslie Hotson as 'a most capable and energetic manager.'7 After Davenant's death Betterton prospered as theatrical manager until 1682. In 1676 Killigrew came into a bitter conflict with his son Charles; Killigrew had promised to make over to Charles all his power and authority in the company, however, Killigrew did not honour this deal, and a yearlong struggle between the two ensued. Finally in 1677 Charles got his way and took over the Theatre Company and the position as Master of Revels. Killigrew had sold all his rights to the company and any profit made by his shares went straight to his creditors. Charles Killigrew was not happy about inheriting this debt, but unfortunately he faired no better as a theatre manager. In under a year he was forced to allow the actors self-government. After much mismanagement and double dealing the company collapsed in 1682, by November of that year the Duke's Company moved into Drury Lane and the two companies became one. For the next twelve years the United Company would be London's only troupe of players. Thomas Killigrew died on 19 March 1683.
Union (1682)
Under the guidance of Betterton, The United Company prospered at Drury Lane.
However, in 1688 William Davenant's son, Alexander gained control of the company
and removed Betterton from managerial responsibility. By 1692 the theatre
was £800 in debt, the actors were up in arms and the audience numbers
had fallen. It was then that Alexander Davenant and Charles Killigrew decided
to cut the actors salaries, heightening the tension in the company and pushing
it to breaking point. Alexander Davenant was soon discovered to be embezzling
funds from the theatre and fled to the Canary Islands in 1693.
Disunion
(1695)
In 1687 Christopher Rich bought into the company and by 1693 had weaselled
his way into power and control of the theatre; in Hotson's book he is described
as, 'as sly a Tyrant as ever was at the Head of a Theatre.'8
Rich cut salaries and pitted the actors against each other. Betterton could
take no more and soon gathered the actors together and made a bid for freedom.
On 25 March 1695 King William III issued the grant for a separate licence.
This was issued to Betterton, Mrs. Barry, Mrs. Bracegirdle, Bowman, Williams,
Underhill, Doggett, Bowen, Mrs. Verbruggen, Mrs. Leigh and Bright. Betterton's
company moved back to Lincoln's Inn Fields and London once again had two Companies
to applaud.
Rival Companies
Betterton's company continued with the most success. It had the best and most
well known actors, this brought the audiences in. Rich's popularity with shareholders
plummeted as the financial situation of the theatre continued to worsen. Betterton's
players, however, were becoming slack under self-government and he could no
longer hold them together. In 1698 Jeremy Collier wrote A Short View of
the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage; this smote the theatres
while they were already crippled. Though both companies survived these bad
times, Christopher Rich had little more theatrical success while Betterton
continued at Lincoln's Inn Fields until, in his old age, the company moved
to the new theatre in the Haymarket built by Captain John Vanburgh.
| Actor | Company | Parts played in the selected texts of the Module EN3061 Restoration Theatre. |
| Thomas Betterton | Duke's | Dorimant, Belvile, King Lear, Jaffeir, Sir John Brute, Fainall |
| Charles Hart | Kings | Horner, Antony |
| Michael Mohun | Kings | Pinchwife, Ventidius |
| John Verbruggen | Dukes | Constant, Mirabell, Sullen |
| William Smith | Dukes | Sir Fopling, Willmore, Edgar, Pierre |
| Anthony Leigh | Dukes | Old Bellair, Antonio |
| Actress | Company | Parts played in the selected texts of the Module EN3061 Restoration Theatre. |
| Elizabeth Barry | Dukes | Cordelia, Belvedira, Lady Brute, Mrs Marwood |
| Mary Betterton | Dukes | Belinda (Etherege), Florinda |
| Elizabeth Boutell | Kings | Margery Pinchwife, Cleopatra |
| Anne Bracegirdle | Dukes | Bellinda (Vanbrugh), Millamant |
| Elizabeth Currer | Dukes | Aquilina |
| Mary Lee | Dukes | Mrs Loveit, Regan |
|
Elizabeth Barry (1658-1713)9 |
Nell Gwyn (1650-1687)12
|
Anne Bracegirdle (c.1674-1748)16 |
|
|
MOHUN, MICHAEL (c. 1625-1684)20 Pepys 20 November 1660 Pepys 22 November 1660
|
|
1 Anthony Masters,
The Play of Personality in the Restoration Theatre, ed. Simon Trussler,
the Boydell Press 1992, p.83.
2 http://www.gwu.edu/~klarsen/theatre.html
3 Theatre in Europe: a Documentary
History: Restoration and Georgian England, 1660-1788, ed. David Thomas,
Cambridge University Press 1989, p.7.
4 Ibid., p.12.
5 Ibid., p.11.
6 Ibid., p.135.
7 Leslie Hotson, The Commonwealth
and Restoration Stage, Russell & Russell Inc 1962, p.219.
8 Ibid., p.293.
9 Montague Summers, The Restoration
Theatre, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co 1934, plate I.
10 Theatre in Europe: a Documentary
History: Restoration and Georgian England, 1660-1788, ed. David Thomas,
Cambridge University Press 1989, p.144.
11 Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Eleventh Edition, Volume III, Cambridge University Press 1910, p.444.
12 The London Stage 1660-1800:
Vol 1 1660-1700, ed. William Van Lennep, Sourthern Illinois University
Press 1965, between pp.64-65.
13 Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Eleventh Edition, Volume XII, Cambridge University Press 1910, p.750.
14 Ibid., p.750.
15 Ibid., p.750.
16 Montague Summers, The Restoration
Theatre, plate XIX, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co 1934,
facing p.224.
17 Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Eleventh Edition, Volume IV, Cambridge University Press 1910, p.358.
18 Ibid., p.358.
19 Theatre in Europe: a Documentary
History: Restoration and Georgian England, 1660-1788, ed. David Thomas,
Cambridge University Press 1989, p.130.
20 Ibid., p.129.
21 Samuel Pepys, The Diary of Samuel
Pepys, The Globe edition, Macmillian & Co Ltd 1905, p.56.
22 Ibid., p.57.
23 Anthony Masters, The Play
of Personality in the Restoration Theatre, ed. Simon Trussler, the
Boydell Press 1992, p.98.
24 Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Eleventh Edition, Volume III, Cambridge University Press 1910, p.832.