Additional end-of-module questions

Learning progression and academic development

  1. Did the module allow you to make sufficient progress from undergraduate to postgraduate level? Please explain your answer. {Text box}
  2. What is the most valuable experience that you took from your dissertation or project? {Text box}
  3. The modules I have taken previously have prepared me well for this module.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  4. How did this module fit with your prior learning?

    • Not enough was new – I already knew most of the material
    • Mostly review – Some new content, but largely familiar
    • Well balanced – A good mix of review and new learning
    • Somewhat advanced – Assumed more prior knowledge than I had
    • Too much prior knowledge was assumed – I struggled to keep up
  5. Compared with other modules at this level, the module was:
    Likert scale: Much easier, Somewhat easier, About the same difficulty, Somewhat more difficult, Much more difficult
  6. Has the module helped you develop your research plans, either for your MLitt dissertation or potential PhD work? Please explain your answer. {Text box}

Skills, employability and professional growth

  1. What are the most important skills you have gained from this module? Please explain your answer. {Text box}
  2. What skills did you learn from this module that will prepare you for future employment? {Text box}
  3. What do you view as your greatest achievement on this module (so far, if elements are still outstanding)? {Text box}
  4. The knowledge and skills developed in this module will be useful in the future.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  5. I have gained valuable new knowledge and skills.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  6. What other subjects, within the scope of this module but not currently covered by it, would you like to see covered? {Text box}

Independent learning and student effort

  1. What aspects of this module helped you work independently? {Text box}
  2. Please reflect on the effort you put into this module overall and whether you feel this enabled you to achieve a good learning outcome. {Text box}
  3. I worked consistently well through the module.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  4. On average, what was the total time you spent working on this module per week?
    Multiple choice: 0-10 hours, 11-20 hours, 21-30 hours, more than 30 hours
  5. The average number of hours I spent per week on lab activities was:
    Multiple choice: 0-2.5, 2.6-4, 4.5-6, More than 6

Curriculum content and subject coverage

  1. This module related well to other modules in the programme.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  2. I found the material taught in this module challenging.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Integration of teaching and learning activities

  1. Did the various elements of the module work together as an integrated whole? Please explain your answer. {Text box}
  2. The different elements of this module provided a learning experience that was balanced between formal theoretical analysis and real-world relevance.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  3. In this module, I was able to genuinely understand the material, not just prepare for assessments.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Sustainability and global relevance

  1.  Please address the statements about sustainable development below.
    • I am familiar with the concept of sustainable development as defined by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
    • The module covered topics which are related to sustainable development (social, economic, environmental).
    • The coverage of topics related to sustainable development was satisfactory.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Teaching and support

  1.  Please address the statements about guest speakers below.
    • Guest lectures were pitched at a level appropriate for this stage in my studies.
    • Overall the guest speakers were knowledgeable about their topics.
    • Overall the guest speakers were approachable and responded well to questions.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  1. The seminars enhanced my understanding of the subject.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  2. The tutorials enhanced my understanding of the subject.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  3. The workshops enhanced my understanding of the subject.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  4. Practical classes enhanced my understanding of the subject.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  5. The demonstrator(s) supported my learning during practical classes.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Fieldwork

  1.  Please address the statements about field excursions below.
    • Sufficient information was provided prior to the field excursions.
    • Field excursions were well designed.
    • Sufficient guidance was provided during the field excursions.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  2. Please address the statements about fieldwork below.
    • The level of intellectual challenge associated with the fieldwork component of this module was appropriate.
    • The amount of learning achieved during the fieldwork component of this module was appropriate.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Practicals and labs

  1.  Please address the statements about laboratory sessions below.
    • Sufficient information was provided for the laboratory practicals.
    • Laboratory sessions were well designed.
    • Sufficient guidance was provided during the laboratory sessions.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  2. Please address the statements about laboratory work below.
    • The level of intellectual challenge associated with the laboratory component of this module was appropriate.
    • The amount of learning achieved during the laboratory component of this module was appropriate.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree.
  3. Laboratory activities helped develop my ability to acquire and analyse relevant experimental data.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Online delivery

  1. What aspects of online delivery do you think were most and least effective, and why? {Text box}
  2. How did online delivery support and/or create barriers for your learning? {Text box}

Group work and community

  1.  Please address the statements about group work below.
    • The School’s expectations regarding responsibilities within the group have been clear.
    • The arrangements for distributing marks to group members were fair.
    • Group work has allowed me to learn more about the subject than an individual project/dissertation would have done.
    • I have learned lessons about my ability to work in a group.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  2. What lessons have you learned about groupwork? {Text box}
  3. What fraction of the non-compulsory sessions in this module did you attend?
    Multiple choice: 0-20%, 21-40%, 41-60%, 61-80%, 80-100%
  4. If you did not attend all of the non-compulsory sessions, what were the main reasons for this? {Text box}
  5. Please address the statements below about peer-support.
    • I attended most of the peer-support group sessions.
    • The peer-support sessions were very useful.
      Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Workload and contact time

  1. Is the total class contact time of 15 hours sufficient, or would you prefer more or less? {Text box}
  2. Is the total class contact time sufficient, or would you prefer more or less? {Text box}
  3. Are the 3-hour class blocks effective, or would you prefer a different delivery pattern, and if so, what would that be? {Text box}
  4. Are the class blocks effective, or would you prefer a different delivery pattern, and if so, what would that be? {Text box}

Equality, diversity and inclusivity

  1. Did the module present a diverse overview of contributors to the field and/or historical barriers to participation, avoiding harmful stereotypes?
    Multiple choice: Yes, No, Don’t know - {Text box}
  2. Was the module content and were the teaching methods relevant and suitable for all students, irrespective of their individual circumstances (gender, ethnicity, disability, etc).
    Multiple choice: Yes, No, Don’t know - {Text box}
  3. The skills instruction provided a good grounding in skills applied in this module.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  4. Instructors on this module treated students with respect.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree

Use of AI

  1. How often did you use AI in this module.
    Likert scale: All the time, Most of the time, Sometimes, Rarely, Never

PGCAP Qs

  1. How has your teaching practice been affected by what you learned on this module? {Text box}

Classics Qs

  1. What have you most enjoyed about studying Classical Studies at sub-hons level? {Text box}
  2. What would you most like to have studied that was not available? {Text box}
  3. What subjects or topics would you have liked to focus on more than you did? {Text box}
  4. What subjects or topics would you have liked to focus on less than you did? {Text box}

 Medicine Qs

  1. The weekly topic workshops helped me to develop skills to critically appraise the literature.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  2. The opportunity for feedback on my presentation skills was valuable.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  3. I felt my personal tutor was able to help me if I requested it.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  4. The patient partners helped me develop confidence in my communication and consultation skills.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  5. The reflective writing workshop and portfolio tasks aided my development as a professional.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  6. This module helped to consolidate my clinical learning.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  7. This module has made me feel ready to move to my partner School.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  8. The patient scenario cycles were informative.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  9. The clinical reasoning sessions were relevant for the course.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  10. The ward simulation was a valuable experience.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  11. I have been able to apply learning from this module to my teaching practice.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  12. The scheduled online synchronous workshops were a necessary component of this module.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  13. The pre online synchronous workshop preparation was achievable in the given timeframe.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  14. The scheduled online synchronous workshops were a necessary component of this module.
    Likert scale: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly disagree
  15. What have you enjoyed most about CLIC and GCM days and what improvements, if any, would you suggest? {Text box}
  16. What have you enjoyed about Agents of Change and what improvements, if any, would you suggest? {Text box}
  17. What have you enjoyed most about guided studies and what improvements, if any, would you suggest? {Text box}
  18. What have you enjoyed most about PJ/UC and what improvements, if any, would you suggest? {Text box}