If the download does not begin automatically, please click here

Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields

Phys. Rev. - Phys. Ed. Res. (submitted)

Laurens Bollen, Paul van Kampen, Charles Baily, M. Kelly, and Mieke De Cock

Abstract: The ability to switch between various representations is an invaluable problem-solving skill in physics. In addition, research has shown that using multiple representations can greatly enhance a person's understanding of mathematical and physical concepts. This paper describes a study of student difficulties regarding interpreting, constructing and switching between representations of vector fields, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. We first identified to what extent students are fluent with the use of field vector plots, field line diagrams and symbolic expressions of vector fields by conducting individual student interviews and analyzing in-class student activities. Based on those findings, we designed the Vector Field Representations (VFR) test, a free response assessment that has been given to 196 second- and third-year physics, mathematics and engineering students from four different universities. From the obtained results we gained a comprehensive overview of typical errors that students make when switching between vector field representations. In addition, the study allowed us to determine the relative prevalence of the observed difficulties. Although the results varied greatly between institutions, a general trend revealed that many students struggle with vector addition, fail to recognize the field line density as an indication of the magnitude of the field, confuse field lines and equipotential lines, and do not choose the appropriate coordinate system when writing out mathematical expressions of vector fields. While these investigations require follow-up studies, the findings suggest interesting opportunities for both researchers and teachers.

Keywords: Physics education research, electrodynamics.