BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.17.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260525T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260525T110000
DTSTAMP:20260518T162933Z
CREATED:20260518T162903Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260518T162933Z
UID:10019607-1779701400-1779706800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: no meeting on 25 May
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-8-2-2-2-2/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260525T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260525T150000
DTSTAMP:20260522T113029Z
CREATED:20260403T085249Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260522T113029Z
UID:10019622-1779714000-1779721200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Unity Seminar: No Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/unity-seminar-26-8/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Unity Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260525T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260525T170000
DTSTAMP:20260403T154721Z
CREATED:20260403T154720Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260403T154721Z
UID:10019637-1779721200-1779728400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:WIKI: No Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/wiki-seminar-4-8/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:WIKI Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260526T113000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260526T130000
DTSTAMP:20260325T142433Z
CREATED:20260219T100730Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260325T142433Z
UID:10019715-1779795000-1779800400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Philosophy of Language Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-mind-seminar/2026-05-26/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Philosophy of Language
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260526T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260526T170000
DTSTAMP:20260406T102314Z
CREATED:20260406T102313Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260406T102314Z
UID:10019667-1779807600-1779814800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar - Avery Hawkins (In person)
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar-17-8/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260528T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260528T143000
DTSTAMP:20260515T134030Z
CREATED:20260414T155906Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260515T134030Z
UID:10019701-1779973200-1779978600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:ECT Seminar: Adam Carter (Glasgow). Good moves. A Risk-Theoretic Account of Telic Know-How
DESCRIPTION:Title: Good Moves: A Risk-Theoretic Account of Telic Know-How \nAbstract: I defend a new account of telic know-how\, what I call the Good Moves (GM) account. To know how to complete a telic task T is to possess a stable\, trainable disposition to select and sequence good moves across T’s state space\, where a move is good just in case it robustly reduces the risk of task-failure across a neighbourhood of nearby contexts. The GM account reconstructs the intellectualism / anti-intellectualism dispute as a dispute over two distinct functional roles within a single disposition: an underwriting role (occupied by propositional and quasi-propositional representations) and a manifestation role (occupied by motor and perceptual systems). Their relative weight shifts systematically with three structural parameters of the task environment (namely\, the volatility\, alignment\, and precision of a task) which together yield a taxonomy of practical domains from routine/friendly to hostile. The view builds an anti-luck condition into the unit of action itself in such a way as to dispose of Gettier-style worries at the source; it accommodates gradability and context-sensitivity without multiplying kinds of know-how and\, further\, grounds two empirically familiar grades of practical credit\, one Watsonian (attributability) and one Aristotelian (accountability).
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/ect-seminar-14/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260528T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260528T170000
DTSTAMP:20260518T090308Z
CREATED:20260516T151001Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260518T090308Z
UID:10019682-1779980400-1779987600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics & Logic Seminar: Christopher Masterman: "Are abstraction principles all that explanatory?""
DESCRIPTION:An increasingly popular view is that abstracta are thin—their existence alone makes little or no demand on the world. The most sophisticated defence of this view to date is the version of abstractionism found in Linnebo’s recent book Thin Objects (2018). On this view\, good abstraction principles should be understood as involving claims about asymmetric metaphysical dependencies between abstracta (e.g.\, directions\, letter types\, sets) and more familiar objects (e.g.\, lines\, letter tokens\, pluralities). In many ways\, such a view is a highly promising development of more traditional versions of abstractionism. However\, in this paper\, I argue that it\, and any view sufficiently like it\, should ultimately be rejected\, since it cannot adequately respond to a neglected explanatory challenge—what I call the characterisation challenge. This is the demand that any theory of abstracta should accommodate explanations for why abstracta are the way they are. In short\, I argue that the nature of abstracta problematically outstrips the explanatory resources available to this kind of ‘metaphysically serious’ abstractionism.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-logic-seminar-8/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR