BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.17.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T110000
DTSTAMP:20240930T082655Z
CREATED:20240930T082654Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240930T082655Z
UID:10019136-1730107800-1730113200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Strode's Consequentiae
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-5-2/2024-10-28/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241028T140000
DTSTAMP:20240912T154838Z
CREATED:20240912T154837Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240912T154838Z
UID:10019349-1730116800-1730124000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Unity Seminar: Invited Talk (Online) - Varzi 'Open Issues in Mereotopology'
DESCRIPTION:Title: Open Problems in Mereotopology \nAbstract:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/unity-seminar-16/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Unity Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241029T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241029T170000
DTSTAMP:20241027T183928Z
CREATED:20241027T183928Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241027T183928Z
UID:10019164-1730214000-1730221200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar: Lara Scheibli (St Andrews) - In-person
DESCRIPTION:Title: Why Professors Should Not Sleep With Their Students – The Epistemology of Consent and Professor-Student Sex \nAbstract: My main interest is explaining the wrong involved in professors (or any teaching staff) sleeping with their students\, and to consider the viability of explaining at least some of the harm in a consent framework. While alternative explanations for the wrong of professor-student sex have been offered (recently: Srinivasan 2021)\, I argue here that professors ought to not sleep with their students due issues relating to sexual consent and the lack thereof. I argue that apparently consensual professor-student relationships are either (1) actually non-consensual or (2) minimally involve unacceptable moral risk. To establish this\, I consider relevant sociological and psychological research regarding those relationships\, including student self-reports\, and studies of the phenomenon of delayed disclosure (and recognition) of sexual violence.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar-13-7/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241030T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241030T170000
DTSTAMP:20241102T151321Z
CREATED:20240530T072650Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241102T151321Z
UID:10019178-1730300400-1730307600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar:
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-21/2024-10-30/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241031T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241031T120000
DTSTAMP:20241029T111542Z
CREATED:20241009T132357Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241029T111542Z
UID:10019190-1730372400-1730376000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Arché Staff/Student Organisational Meeting
DESCRIPTION:Every semester\, we hold an all-of-Arché Staff/Student organisational meeting for everyone to attend. Tea/Coffee will be available. Agenda TBC
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar-5-3/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Workshops
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241031T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241031T143000
DTSTAMP:20250930T082245Z
CREATED:20240530T073818Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250930T082245Z
UID:10019522-1730379600-1730385000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar:
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-9/2024-10-31/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241031T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20241031T143000
DTSTAMP:20241027T165513Z
CREATED:20241018T152100Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241027T165513Z
UID:10019206-1730379600-1730385000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Justin Snedegar (Marusic and White on Peer Disagreement)
DESCRIPTION:Justin Snedegar to lead discussion on “Disagreement and Alienation” by Marusic and White (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/phpe.12197) \nAbstract: \nThis paper proposes to reorient the philosophical debate about peer disagreement. The problem of peer disagreement is normally seen as a problem about the extent to which disagreement provides one with evidence against one’s own conclusions. It is thus regarded as a problem for individual inquiry. But things look different in more collaborative contexts. Ethical norms relevant to those contexts make a difference to the epistemology. In particular\, we argue that a norm of mutual answerability applies to us when we engage in shared inquiry with others\, and precludes us from treating one another’s conflicting judgments as evidence relevant to the dispute. From this it follows that standard philosophical accounts of peer disagreement—e.g.\, the Equal Weight View and the Total Evidence View—presuppose that the disagreeing parties are in a sense alienated from one another. It’s doubtful that such forms of alienated disagreement should be treated as the central case.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-9-2/
LOCATION:Online Meeting via Teams
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR