BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.17.4//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240625T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240625T140000
DTSTAMP:20240618T095753Z
CREATED:20240618T095743Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240618T095753Z
UID:10018930-1719316800-1719324000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind seminar: No seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-39/
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240625T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240625T170000
DTSTAMP:20240624T081318Z
CREATED:20240624T081211Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240624T081318Z
UID:10018996-1719327600-1719334800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar - Viviane Fairbank (St. Andrews and Stirling) (online)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Some Thoughts on Victimhood and Feminism \nAbstract: In her book Conflict Is Not Abuse (2016)\, Sarah Schulman argues that\, in many domains of public and private life\, false accusations of harm allow (groups of) people to conflate “conflict\,” which is quotidian\, and “abuse\,” which is more problematic but infrequent. The general tendency to mis-identify difficult situations as instances of “abuse” leads to an inability to mediate social problems\, and thus prevents the realization of progressive politics. This\, she argues\, is a reason for socially-minded feminists and activists to reconsider their relationship to so-called victimhood culture. \nI understand Schulman’s book as a distinctive contribution to the genre of “anti-victimhood” literature that has recently gained prominence\, including among some feminist (and many other anti-feminist) scholars. In this talk\, I argue that Schulman’s arguments rely on assumptions about the nature of abuse and victimhood that deserve to be made explicit—notably\, the assumptions that (1) there is always a fact of the matter about who\, in any one situation\, is the victim\, and (2) that this fact is always available to be uncovered by rational agents. I argue that these assumptions do not stand up to empirical or philosophical scrutiny. Feminist philosophers should consequently find ways of thinking about victimhood that allow us to learn from the best version of Schulman’s ideas while nevertheless rejecting such assumptions.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar-12-13-3/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240626T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240626T170000
DTSTAMP:20240624T085622Z
CREATED:20240327T152429Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240624T085622Z
UID:10018864-1719414000-1719421200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Shawn Simpson (University of Pittsburgh)
DESCRIPTION:Title: ‘Logic and Inference in the Sender-Receiver Model’ \nAbstract: Logic\, inference\, language – somehow these are all connected. But how? One of David Lewis’s goals in his book Convention (1969) was to answer this question. There\, he presented what is now known as the sender-receiver model of communication\, and he revealed how conventionally meaningful communication might come about. Many who held a conventionalist theory of meaning\, however\, also supported a conventionalist theory of logic. In this talk\, I’ll investigate the nature of logic and inference from the point of view of the new model. The first part of the talk will introduce the model and some of its details. The second part will be a survey of work on logic that’s been done with the model so far. The third part of the talk will look at a new signaling game that involves agents following rules of a non-classical logic. I’ll finish with a discussion of the implications of this way of looking at logic and related issues and ideas for future lines of research.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-19-14/
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T120000
DTSTAMP:20240529T144004Z
CREATED:20240529T144003Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240529T144004Z
UID:10019062-1719482400-1719489600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar-3-3/2024-06-27/
CATEGORIES:Plenary session
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T143000
DTSTAMP:20240624T103556Z
CREATED:20240320T133438Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240624T103556Z
UID:10018784-1719493200-1719498600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Matt McGrath (Washington University in St Louis)
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Matt McGrath (Washington University in St Louis) \nShould have Known and Epistemically Appropriate Belief\nSometimes people don’t know things they should have known. For instance\, cardiologists should know about recent major developments that bear on their practice; if they don’t know\, they should have. Can what a person should have known matter to what they’re epistemically appropriate to believe? Call the view that it can “should-have-known impurism.” If the cardiologist believes the usual treatment for a certain type of heart disease is best but should have known that an alternative treatment outperformed it in a recent large study\, it seems the cardiologist isn’t believing as she should. In this paper\, I dig into the reasoning behind or suggested by intuitions like this. Once we locate this reasoning\, we can probe its structure\, assess its quality\, and explore variations of it\, along with its relation to intuitions on the opposing “purist” side. In the end\, I argue that we can capture what the impurist gets right without accepting impurism. This is important because\, as I argue\, impurism faces serious problems.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-7-8/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240627T170000
DTSTAMP:20240327T133211Z
CREATED:20240320T135510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240327T133211Z
UID:10018848-1719500400-1719507600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Unity Pre-Reading: Quasi-Analysis I
DESCRIPTION:Leitgeb\, Hannes (2007). A New Analysis of Quasianalysis. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):181-226. \nhttps://philpapers.org/rec/LEIANA-3
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/unity-pre-reading-quasi-analysis/
LOCATION:Arché Seminar Room\, 17-19 College Street\, St Andrews\, KY169AL
CATEGORIES:Unity Seminar
GEO:56.3408615;-2.7948441
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Arché Seminar Room 17-19 College Street St Andrews KY169AL;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=17-19 College Street:geo:-2.7948441,56.3408615
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20240628T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20240628T170000
DTSTAMP:20240620T074754Z
CREATED:20240318T124733Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240620T074754Z
UID:10018837-1719568800-1719594000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:All Arché Research Day
DESCRIPTION:The All Arché Research Day is a whole-of-Arché get-together. It’s an opportunity to foster interaction between research streams\, and to celebrate achievements from the year 2023-2024. \nSession 1: 10am-11am (Chair: Jessica Brown) \nTalk 1 Katharina Bernhard: Epistemic Projection and Inductive Risk \nCoffee Break: 11am-11:30am \nSession 2: 11:30am-1pm (Chair: Francesco Berto) \nLightning talks: 11:30am-12noon\n(Jessica Brown\, Greg Restall\, Cecily Whiteley) \nTalk 2: 12noon-1:00pm\nViviane Fairbank: Is Logic Objective? \nLunch Break: 1:00pm-2:00pm (Catered) \nSession 3: 2:00pm-3:00pm (Chair: Aaron Cotnoir) \nTalk 3: Hoaxu Wang: On the Qualification of Being—A Quiddity in the Context of Russellian Monism \nCoffee Break: 3:00pm-3:30pm \nSession 4: 3:30pm-5:00pm (Chair: Jade Fletcher) \nLightning talks: 3:30pm-4:00pm\n(Aaron Cotnoir\, Francesco Berto\, …) \nTalk 4: 4:00pm-5:00pm\nEmma Holmes: The Philosophy of Diets \nAfter Drinks at Brewdog
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/all-arche-research-day/
CATEGORIES:Workshops
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR