BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.17.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231204T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231204T110000
DTSTAMP:20231105T211905Z
CREATED:20230829T092626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231105T211905Z
UID:10018733-1701682200-1701687600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-4-2/2023-12-04/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231205T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231205T140000
DTSTAMP:20231128T123742Z
CREATED:20231128T123539Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231128T123742Z
UID:10018651-1701777600-1701784800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: Matthew Soteriou (King's College London)
DESCRIPTION:Title: The Experienced Present\, the Strict Present\, and the Passage of Time \nAbstract: \nIn this talk I will outline a view according to which the experienced present is best understood as the origin of the sort of temporal point of view that we occupy when we are conscious\, and our experience of the passage of time is best understood as experience of apparent change in location of the origin of that temporal point of view. I shall discuss how this way of thinking of the experienced present bears on debates about the so-called ‘doctrine of the specious present’. This will include a discussion of some of the ways in which the phenomenology of our experience of the passage of time can help diagnose some sources of resistance to the idea that the experienced present is an interval. I shall be suggesting that while the experienced present has duration\, there is nonetheless a sense in which we seem to experience the passage of time in a way that makes tempting the idea that there must be a strict present. So there is a respect in which the phenomenology of our temporal experience speaks in favour of the strict present\, and also tells against it\, which in turn makes tempting the claim that the experienced present is ‘specious’.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-24/
LOCATION:Online via Teams
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231205T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231205T170000
DTSTAMP:20231114T162626Z
CREATED:20231114T162212Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231114T162626Z
UID:10018665-1701788400-1701795600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar -  Miguel de la Cal Moreno (St Andrews & Stirling)
DESCRIPTION:This week we are doing a reading group on Carl Cassegård and Håkan Thörn Towards a Critique of the Environmental Movement. (chapter 5 of Post-Apocalyptic Environmentalism) \nYou can download it here: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-13203-2 \n 
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar-10/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231206T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231206T170000
DTSTAMP:20231121T111453Z
CREATED:20230913T113746Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231121T111453Z
UID:10018679-1701874800-1701882000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Alberto Rappuoli (University of St Andrews and University of Stirling)
DESCRIPTION:Title: On the Plurality of Analyses: From Lewis Back to Russell and Moore \nAbstract: It is often argued that\, amongst the various existing philosophical traditions\, the one that enjoys the widest support is the analytic tradition. And\, indeed\, it is undoubtedly true that many philosophers would be prepared to describe themselves as ‘analytic philosophers’. Yet what such a statement of affiliation entails is far from evident. Just as it is clear that there is something in common amongst all analytic philosophers\, it is equally clear that we do not know for sure what this something is. Part of the problem\, is that the obvious suggestion that analytic philosophers are united by their adherence to the method of analysis raises unexpected difficulties. Different philosophers\, in fact\, appear to use the term ‘analysis’ to refer to very different methodologies\, with no apparent consensus about what is the best way forward. The fact that none of these methodologies can singularly claim the title of ‘analytic method’\, however\, should not discourage us from paying attention to the interconnections that link them to one another. Quite the contrary\, in this talk I will defend the idea that it is only by attending to these interconnections that we can appreciate how seemingly distinct modes of analysis combine to form a unified methodological framework. A methodological framework\, which\, as I will illustrate\, ties together the analytic revolution inaugurated by Frege\, Russell\, and Moore with the modal metaphysics of David Lewis.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-15/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231207T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231207T120000
DTSTAMP:20230915T091550Z
CREATED:20230829T094510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230915T091550Z
UID:10018693-1701943200-1701950400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar: No Meeting
DESCRIPTION:We use the plenary seminar time slot on occasions when we have a meeting of wider interest to the whole Arché community.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar/2023-12-07/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231207T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231207T143000
DTSTAMP:20231203T212820Z
CREATED:20231203T212819Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231203T212820Z
UID:10018707-1701954000-1701959400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Tomos Gwydion Ap Sion (St Andrews) "Replication and theory development in the social and psychological sciences"
DESCRIPTION:It is a hallmark of social and psychological science that its findings should be reproducible across relevant contexts\, playing a key role in showcasing the reliability of detected effects. However\, following what some have called a “watershed” moment\, a “crisis of confidence” has befallen the discipline\, with commentators zeroing in on the Reproducibility Project’s low replication estimate of 36-47% (Open Science Collaboration\, 2015; Pashler & Wagenmakers\, 2012; Wiggins & Christopherson\, 2019). The theory crisis is another perhaps less well-known issue facing social and psychological science\, with researchers arguing that its theories are generally of poor quality (Eronen & Bringmann\, 2021; Fiedler\, 2017; Oberauer & Lewandowsky\, 2019). Due to this\, theories are often not clearly accepted or refuted\, tending to come and go with little of the cumulative progress often associated with scientific knowledge. In this presentation\, I aim to look at how the replication and theory crises interact in social and psychological science with particular emphasis on the relationship between replication and theory development. Following an overview of both crises\, the first half of the presentation will look at the way in which replications can support theory development\, covering the identification of robust phenomena\, the identification of  effects’ boundary conditions\, and the evaluation of theories’ predictions. The second half of the presentation will cover a number of more recent arguments suggesting that well-specified theory is required for replications to be informative (Irvine\, 2021; Klein\, 2014; Muthukrishna & Henrich\, 2019). I will argue against a strong reading of this position.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-6-14/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR