BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.18.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231002T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231002T110000
DTSTAMP:20231105T211905Z
CREATED:20230829T092626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231105T211905Z
UID:10018724-1696239000-1696244400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-4-2/2023-10-02/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T140000
DTSTAMP:20230929T221434Z
CREATED:20230929T221126Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230929T221434Z
UID:10018642-1696334400-1696341600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: Rasmus Overmark (St Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Causes and correlations in the link between language and mindreading \nAbstract: This paper proposes a developmental link between language and mindreading. It puts forward two contrasting ways of interpreting this link. One reads the link as causal. On this reading\, language development contributes to the development of mindreading\, so that mindreading could not develop normally had it not been for language. The other reads the link as correlational. This is the pragmatic view. On this reading language development merely contributes to task performance\, and not mindreading development itself\, because language helps the child to correctly interpret the experimenter’s question in the context of a mindreading task. I find that the causal reading is better supported than the correlational reading on two grounds: First\, sometimes subjects’ development in verbal and non-verbal tasks is mirrored\, indicating only a small role for pragmatic factors. Second\, some experiments avoid pragmatic factors entirely but still show major developmental effects from language. I conclude thus that there is a developmental link between language and mindreading\, and that it is a causal one.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-15/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T170000
DTSTAMP:20230829T093454Z
CREATED:20230829T093454Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230829T093454Z
UID:10018656-1696345200-1696352400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar/2023-10-03/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231004T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231004T170000
DTSTAMP:20230921T165548Z
CREATED:20230913T112304Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230921T165548Z
UID:10018670-1696431600-1696438800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Francisca Silva (University of St Andrews and University of Stirling)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Avoid Inconsistency? Two Accounts of Incompatibility \nAbstract: Many take inconsistent states to be not only self-incompatible\, but also to be incompatible with every other state\, whether consistent or inconsistent. On one way of construing such approaches\, two states are incompatible if and only if their fusion is inconsistent (i.e.\, a contradiction can be derived from the resulting state). Having as a background work that has been developed on negation as expressing incompatibility or ruling out\, for instance by Michael Dunn (1993\, 1996)\, Greg Restall (2000) and Franz Berto (2015) (and the latter two together in Berto and Restall (2019))\, as well as work on subtle and blatant inconsistencies by Jago (2014) and Berto and Jago (2019)\, I will explore the prospects of an account of incompatibility according to which two states are incompatible if and only if a contradiction is more easily derivable from the fusion than from any of the parts of the fused states.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-8/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T120000
DTSTAMP:20230915T091550Z
CREATED:20230829T094510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230915T091550Z
UID:10018684-1696500000-1696507200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar: No Meeting
DESCRIPTION:We use the plenary seminar time slot on occasions when we have a meeting of wider interest to the whole Arché community.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar/2023-10-05/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T143000
DTSTAMP:20230928T154005Z
CREATED:20230912T134920Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230928T154005Z
UID:10018698-1696510800-1696516200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Nick Kuespert (St Andrews) "I think I got it right"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In this chapter\, I present a novel argument for optimism about moral testimony\, the view that it is permissible to rely on moral testimony when forming one’s moral beliefs. The argument is simple: it is permissible to rely on one’s own moral beliefs formed in the past even if the underlying reasons for the belief are no longer accessible to the agent. But there is no (relevant) difference between relying on one’s past self and other agents – or if there is\, it cuts the wrong way. Recognising that reliance on intrapersonal moral testimony is permissible should thus lead us to conclude that reliance on interpersonal moral testimony is likewise permissible. I explore some consequences for both optimism and pessimism about moral testimony following these considerations and argue that the discussion opens up the possibility for a more nuanced optimism about moral testimony.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-6-4/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR