BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.18.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230410T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230410T110000
DTSTAMP:20230508T101413Z
CREATED:20221025T081119Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230508T101413Z
UID:10017812-1681119000-1681124400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Obligationes
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-3/2023-04-10/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230410T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230410T170000
DTSTAMP:20230404T093805Z
CREATED:20230404T093804Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230404T093805Z
UID:10017827-1681138800-1681146000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar Franz Berto (University of St. Andrews and University of Amsterdam)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Hyperintensionality\, Overfitting\, and the Descriptive-Prescriptive Dilemma \nAbstract: \nA hyperintensional epistemic logic would take the contents which can be known or believed as more fine-grained than sets of possible worlds. I rebut two objections to the very idea: the Descriptive-Prescriptive Dilemma and Williamson’s Objection from Overfitting. I propose a hyperintensional account of propositions as sets of worlds enriched with topics: what those propositions\, and so the attitudes towards them\, are about. I show that the account captures robust intuitions of same-saying; that it can be pervasively applied in formal and mainstream epistemology; and that it is left unscathed by both objections.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-4-3/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230411T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230411T140000
DTSTAMP:20230404T220623Z
CREATED:20230403T130616Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230404T220623Z
UID:10018042-1681214400-1681221600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar | Stephano Pugnaghi "What it takes to introduce a proper name!"
DESCRIPTION:The literature on proper names has grown considerably in the past decades\, with the formulation of a wide variety of new ways to analyse these expressions both semantically and metasemantically. Many in the literature have attempted to solve the problems of the classical views of naming by advancing new kinds of semantic accounts of these expressions. In contrast with these approaches\, my aim in this talk is to maintain a broadly classical referentialist semantic analysis of naming expressions (roughly inspired by the considerations in Naming and Necessity) and to attempt to solve some of the problems advanced in the literature by presenting a new metasemantic picture of names. As such\, in this talk I will present and clarify a partially revised notion of names’ Introduction\, focusing particularly on the necessary and sufficient conditions an act of introduction for a name must satisfy in order to be successful. The account presented will importantly diverge from some of the traditional metasemantic theories\, giving centrality to the notion of conceivability and relying on speakers’ referential intentions.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-10-5/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230411T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230411T170000
DTSTAMP:20230327T130509Z
CREATED:20221025T083708Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230327T130509Z
UID:10018570-1681225200-1681232400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosphy and Social Theory
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/feminist-philosphy-and-social-theory/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230412T103000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230412T120000
DTSTAMP:20230503T102807Z
CREATED:20230301T144118Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230503T102807Z
UID:10018566-1681295400-1681300800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Masterclass on Synthetic Philosophy
DESCRIPTION:Three-session masterclass delivered online by Arché Professorial Fellow Catarina Dutilh Novaes\, via Teams and in Edgecliffe\, Room G03 on (UK time zone): \nApril 12 10:30am-12noon   \nApril 19 10:30am-12noon   \nApril 26 10:30am-12noon   \nThis 3-session masterclass will introduce an approach in philosophy that is now known as ‘synthetic philosophy’: “the enterprise of bringing together insights\, knowledge\, and arguments from the special sciences with the aim to offer a theoretically (reasonably) unified\, coherent account of complex systems and connect these to a wider culture or other philosophical projects (or both).” (Schliesser\, 2019) It is related to\, but interestingly different from\, naturalism in philosophy and empirically-informed philosophy. Current practitioners of synthetic philosophy include Daniel Dennett\, Kim Sterelny and Peter Godfrey-Smith. With the growing fragmentation of scientific knowledge into hyperspecialized disciplines\, there is much need for over-arching\, comprehensive perspectives that provide unified accounts of complex phenomena drawing on various disciplines\, and philosophy is arguably ideally placed for this purpose. \nSession 1: What is synthetic philosophy?   \nGeneral presentation\, historical precedents\, contrast with other styles of philosophy. \nSession 2: The dialogical roots of deduction as an example of synthetic philosophy  \nPresentation of the book The Dialogical Roots of Deduction as a project of synthetic philosophy. \nSession 3: How to design a synthetic philosophy research program  \nPractical discussion of how to design and carry out a research program\, focusing on methodological considerations. \nThis masterclass is open to non-St Andrews research postgrads as well – for info and the link to the online meeting\, e-mail Viviane Fairbank vf45@st-andrews.ac.uk.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/masterclass-on-synthetic-philosophy-2/2023-04-12/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Conference,Workshops
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Chemical_compounds.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230413T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230413T120000
DTSTAMP:20230111T111827Z
CREATED:20230111T111827Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230111T111827Z
UID:10018224-1681380000-1681387200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:General Staff Student Meeting
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/general-staff-student-meeting/
LOCATION:Online Meeting via Teams
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20230413T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20230413T143000
DTSTAMP:20230410T093416Z
CREATED:20230403T103554Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230410T093416Z
UID:10018586-1681390800-1681396200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Current Themes Seminar: Daniel Garibay Garcia (St Andrews) "Group Lies: From Group Speech Acts Inflationism to Group Mental States Inflationism"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In this work\, I’m interested in the relations between accounts of group speech acts and accounts of group mental states. Lackey (2021) argues in favour of group assertion inflationism\, which is the thesis that groups can assert even if no member of the group asserts. But she rejected group belief inflationism\, the thesis that a group can believe that P even if no member believes that P. In this work\, I argue that group intention and belief inflationism follows from group assertion inflationism. In short\, I argue that groups can delegate a lot of their functions\, so it is possible for groups to lie even if none of its members believes that ¬P or intends to deceive about P. Most extensions of lies accounts would require groups to have some mental state about P. Putting these together presents a problem for deflationary accounts of group intention and belief.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-current-themes-seminar-daniel-garibay-garcia-st-andrews/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR