BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.18.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221128T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221128T110000
DTSTAMP:20221019T223839Z
CREATED:20220707T113101Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T223839Z
UID:10017731-1669627800-1669633200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: John Dumbleton\, De Scire
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2022-10-03/2022-11-28/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
ORGANIZER;CN="Stephen Read":MAILTO:arche@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221128T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221128T170000
DTSTAMP:20221125T142130Z
CREATED:20221125T141426Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221125T142130Z
UID:10017746-1669647600-1669654800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar Sophie Nagler (University of St. Andrews and University of Amsterdam)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Meaning\, Structure\, Pluralism: A Co-Determination Theory of Connective Meaning \nAbstract: \nIn this talk\, I propose a proof-theoretic theory of the meaning of logical\nconnectives in a sequent calculus setting. I defend the account by applying it to the debate on logical pluralism. \nWhen do two logical connectives mean the same? Use-conditional theorists of meaning usually reply: when we use the two connectives in the same way. \nWhen we do proofs\, we use the connectives according to their proof rules. Hence\, two logical connectives carry the same meaning iff they are governed by the same proof rules. This use-conditional approach to logical semantics is called proof-theoretic semantics. \nAccording to Restall (2014)\, connective meaning is determined by those parts of the connective-defining rules which are immediate to the introduction/elimination of the connectives\, i.e.\, the active/principal formulae. However\, recent work by Bogdan Dicher (2016) shows that there are proof rules which share active/principal formulae but induce different connective use. To solve this problem\, he proposes the co-determination thesis\, according to which some non-immediate (i.e.\, structural) components of the proof rules also (co-) determine meaning. \nAt this point\, however\, co-determination is a mere thesis. In this talk\, I develop it into a systematic theory of connective meaning. Via a series of Belnapian harmony proofs in minimal deductive contexts\, I prove the exact minimal structural properties co-determining connective meaning for all connectives in the LK-family. This includes classical\, intuitionistic\, dual-intuitionistic\, and lattice logic. \nUltimately\, I argue that we should adopt this account by applying it to the debate on logical pluralism. This way\, I contend that we can overcome some of the shortcomings of Beall and Restall’s famous logical pluralism\, as well as Restall’s 2014 proof-theoretic rendition thereof.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-2-2022-09-19-2022-10-17-7/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221129T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221129T140000
DTSTAMP:20221123T155223Z
CREATED:20220707T115653Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221123T155223Z
UID:10017760-1669723200-1669730400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar | Biancamaria Cepollaro (University Vita-Salute San Raffaele) "Countering Toxic Speech Online – A Qualitative Study on Social Media"
DESCRIPTION:Social philosophy of language has recently focused on toxic speech and counterspeech. Roughly\, toxic speech is discourse that engages (or incites people to engage) in bigoted practices; counterspeech is communication that tries to counteract the harm that other speech may bring about. In this talk\, I consider a counterspeech strategy specifically tailored to address implicit toxic discourse – what Langton (2018) calls blocking. In its most paradigmatic examples\, blocking amounts to spelling out and challenging the objectionable contents implicitly conveyed by a given utterance\, thus preventing toxic material from entering the common ground by default. First\, I’ll illustrate the cognitive and social costs and the drawbacks typically associated with blocking. Then\, I’ll consider online conversations and raise the question of whether and how people engage in blocking on social media\, in light of its costs\, risks\, and repercussions. To address this issue\, I present the qualitative study I ran on Facebook and Twitter\, which resulted in a taxonomy of online blocking\, based on real instances from ecological contexts. My investigation shows how each kind of blocking modulates in a distinctive way the costs and drawbacks usually associated with this practice. 
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-10-2022-11-29/
LOCATION:Online Meeting via Teams
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221130T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221130T180000
DTSTAMP:20221128T103846Z
CREATED:20220707T120014Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221128T103846Z
UID:10017775-1669824000-1669831200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory  Seminar: [CANCELLED]
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/feminist-philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-2022-11-30/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221201T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221201T120000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145458Z
CREATED:20220707T120351Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145458Z
UID:10017787-1669888800-1669896000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/super-special-seminar-7/2022-12-01/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221201T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221201T173000
DTSTAMP:20221120T112113Z
CREATED:20221020T151722Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221120T112113Z
UID:10017807-1669910400-1669915800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Current Themes Seminar: Jules Holroyd (Sheffield) (co-hosted with CEPPA) "Proleptic Praise"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: What is praise? I argue that we can make progress by examining what praise does. Functionalist views of praise are emerging\, but I here argue that by foregrounding cases in which expressions of praise are rejected by their direct target\, we see that praise has a wider\, and largely neglected\, social function. First I introduce cases in which praise is rejected. Then\, I identify a series of desiderata for an analysis of praise by bringing these cases into contact with existing views about what praise is and does. Finally I develop a functionalist account and show how it can meet these desiderata. In outline\, my claim is that one key function of praise is to exert social pressure by bestowing esteem. I tease out some mechanisms via which praise exerts social pressure\, and is particularly difficult to challenge. This analysis is responsive to\, and places at the foreground of our analysis\, the possibility that praise can be used for bad and oppressive ends.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-current-themes-seminar-jules-holroyd-sheffield/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR