BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.18.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221010T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221010T110000
DTSTAMP:20221019T223839Z
CREATED:20220707T113101Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T223839Z
UID:10017724-1665394200-1665399600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: John Dumbleton\, De Scire
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2022-10-03/2022-10-10/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
ORGANIZER;CN="Stephen Read":MAILTO:arche@st-andrews.ac.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221010T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221010T170000
DTSTAMP:20221004T151743Z
CREATED:20220707T115344Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221004T151743Z
UID:10017739-1665414000-1665421200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar Francisca Silva (University of St. Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Title: FDE worlds or inexact truthmaker semantics? \nAbstract: In this talk I will present models for what minimally rational agents know given what they know that meet several (as I shall claim) plausible desiderata for the knowledge states of non-ideal agents. These models can be given either in terms of a space of possible and impossible worlds that Berto and Jago (2019) call FDE worlds\, or in terms of a space of states satisfying a relation of inexact truthmaking\, when both are conjoined with a specific view of subject matters. As far as the semantics goes\, then\, the two approaches are in equally good standing. Should we prefer a talk of states and inexact truthmaking or of impossible worlds and worldly representation? The answer lies in the underlying metaphysics presupposed by both theoretical approaches. I conclude\, then\, by comparing the prospects of both approaches in terms of their metaphysical commitments.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-2-2022-09-19-2022-10-10/
LOCATION:Online Meeting via Teams
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221011T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221011T140000
DTSTAMP:20221004T153159Z
CREATED:20220707T115653Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221004T153159Z
UID:10017753-1665489600-1665496800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar | Daniel Garibay García "Group Lies and Group Bullshit"
DESCRIPTION:Recently\, there has been renewed interest in collective phenomena. Social epistemology has the lead on this topic; but there is a lot left to say on the subject of collective speech. In this talk\, I’m interested in discussing the distinction between group lies and other kinds of deception committed by groups. In this work\, I present a case of group lies that is problematic for most group intention and belief accounts. The main idea is that individuals can lie about P on behalf of a group without the members of the group having any idea (mental state or attitude) about P. I call these external lies. If I’m right this would be not just a surprising result but also problematic data for most accounts of group belief and intention. Possible replies to my claim include modifying our accounts of lies and characterizing my case as a case of bullshiting. A debate about external lies may prove fruitful to discuss how to extend our theories of lies and distinctions between speech acts to the collective case\, and improve our general understanding of deception.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-10-2022-10-11/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221012T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221012T180000
DTSTAMP:20221003T081555Z
CREATED:20220707T120014Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221003T081555Z
UID:10017770-1665590400-1665597600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory  Seminar: David MacDonald
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/feminist-philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-2022-10-12/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221013T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221013T120000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145458Z
CREATED:20220707T120351Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145458Z
UID:10017781-1665655200-1665662400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/super-special-seminar-7/2022-10-13/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20221013T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20221013T143000
DTSTAMP:20221006T133947Z
CREATED:20220707T120554Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221006T133947Z
UID:10017794-1665666000-1665671400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Current Themes Seminar: Winnie Ma (KCL) "Towards an Ethics of Belief for AI: with a Focus on AI Profiling and Algorithmic Discrimination"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: Philosophical research in AI has hitherto largely focused on the ethics of AI. Here we suggest that the time has come to start a novel area of research in AI – the epistemology of AI\, and in particular the ethics of belief of AI. This paper is a collaboration between an ethicist of belief and a machine learning engineer (Dr. Vincent Valton) to investigate the ways in which extant work in the ethics of (human) belief can be applied to an ethics of AI belief\, and in exciting new topics of interest in the latter domain. The focus of today’s talk will be on the ethics of AI belief with respect to AI profiling beliefs and algorithmic discrimination. I here understand “profiling” as forming a belief about an individual on the basis of well-evidenced (by which I don’t mean morally justified) generalizations about a group or groups to which that individual belongs. And I understand “discrimination” as the differential treatment of an individual based on their membership in a particular group or groups. \n(Joint Work-in-Progress by Winnie Ma and Vincent Valton)
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-current-themes-seminar-2022-10-13/
LOCATION:Online Meeting via Teams
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR