BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.18.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220620T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220620T110000
DTSTAMP:20220608T195206Z
CREATED:20210628T115628Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220608T195206Z
UID:10017547-1655717400-1655722800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: no meeting
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2-2022-06-20/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220620T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220620T110000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145630Z
CREATED:20210628T115628Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145630Z
UID:10017541-1655717400-1655722800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave\, Insolubles
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2/2022-06-20/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220620T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220620T170000
DTSTAMP:20220615T122748Z
CREATED:20210628T121010Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220615T122748Z
UID:10017576-1655737200-1655744400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics Seminar Jiqi Liu (Peking University)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Truthmaking beyond truthmakers\, a solution for negative existentials \nAbstract: \nThe problem of negative truths is arguably the puzzle for truthmaking theory\, called the holy grail (Molnar 2000\, 85)\, and the dragon to be slain (Parsons 2006\, 591). I propose to solve a piece of the puzzle\, the truthmaking for negative existentials. My solution introduces the domain as a factor in truthmaking and satisfies the main desideratum of Molnar’s tetrad (2000). It offers a perimeter formed by the domain to constrain the truthmaking\, rather than accepting Necessitarianism that claims the truthmaker necessitates the truth. This solution is a start to piece the puzzle of negative truths\, the truthmaking for negative existentials goes beyond the truthmaker.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-seminar-6-2022-06-20/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220621T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220621T140000
DTSTAMP:20220613T120650Z
CREATED:20210628T122532Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220613T120650Z
UID:10017591-1655812800-1655820000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language & Mind Seminar: Andrew Peet (University of Leeds)
DESCRIPTION:Understanding Plausible Deniability:\n\n\nHow is it that a speaker S can at once make it obvious to an audience A that she intends to communicate some proposition p\, and yet at the same time retain plausible deniability with respect to this intention? The answer\, I suggest\, is that S can bring it about that A has a very high justified credence that ‘S intended p‘ without putting A in a position to know that `S intended p‘. In order to achieve this\, I argue\, the speaker has to exploit a sense in which communication can be lottery-like. Two objections to this proposal are considered: 1. It results in an unacceptable testimonial skepticism\, 2. it conflicts with the standard picture of understanding and communicative success. I argue that the resultant skepticism is limited and plausible. And I suggest that the standard picture of understanding and communicative success is wrong.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-9-2022-04-05-2022-06-21/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220621T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220621T170000
DTSTAMP:20220620T140444Z
CREATED:20210629T142203Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220620T140444Z
UID:10017686-1655823600-1655830800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar: Kate Ritchie (Irvine) "Labeling Unlabeled Identities"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: TBA
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-5-2022-06-21/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220622T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220622T180000
DTSTAMP:20220617T160517Z
CREATED:20210629T140652Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220617T160517Z
UID:10017658-1655913600-1655920800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar: Colin Troesken "Pornography\, Videogames\, and Ideology"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In her 2018 paper “Pornographic Videogames: A Feminist Examination\,” Mari Mikkola argues that pornographic videogames as a category are not problematic or worthy of condemnation from a feminist perspective.  Contra Mikkola \, I advance a view which says that pornographic videogames have category-specific features which make them especially disposed to reinforce bad sexual ideology.  I investigate the ways in which art-categories such as medium and genre ascribe value and meaning to contents within depictions.  I then show that both virtual media and pornography have unique expectations from audiences which partly constitute them both as categories.  In the case of pornographic videogames\, I argue that part of what constitutes the category is an expectation of harmful or misleading sexual imagery which the audience can have a prescribed interactive engagement with.  I go on to show why the interactive and immersive components of pornographic videogames aid in reinforcing harmful sexual ideology.  I conclude that pornographic videogames\, as a category\, are worthy of condemnation from a feminist perspective.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-s2-2022-06-22/
LOCATION:Castclecliffe G5W
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220623T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220623T120000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145615Z
CREATED:20210629T140951Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145615Z
UID:10017670-1655978400-1655985600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/super-special-2022-04-07/2022-06-23/
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220623T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220623T143000
DTSTAMP:20220617T081135Z
CREATED:20210629T150804Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220617T081135Z
UID:10017710-1655989200-1655994600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Sharon Ryan (West Virginia) "The Epistemic State of Wisdom"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: What distinguishes wise people from the masses? The wise person has an impressive grasp on the issues that really matter in life. But what really matters? And what exactly is this impressive grasp? Is the impressive epistemic state of wisdom best categorized as a form of knowledge? If so\, then a wise person is someone who is knowledgeable on the things that really matter in life. I will very briefly make a few claims about the subject matter of wisdom. The remainder of the discussion will focus on the epistemic state of wisdom. \nI will offer for discussion\, several interesting arguments against the view that the epistemic state of wisdom is knowledge. I will argue that some of these arguments are successful\, and therefore it is not true that wise people are those who have knowledge about the things that really matter in life. I will wrap up this presentation arguing that the epistemic state of wisdom is a form of understanding that is not reducible to knowledge.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-5-2022-06-16/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20220624
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20220627
DTSTAMP:20220627T100740Z
CREATED:20211215T092435Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220627T100740Z
UID:10017717-1656061200-1656233999@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemic Breakthroughs Workshop
DESCRIPTION:EPISTEMIC BREAKTHROUGHS: A WORKSHOP \nUniversity of St Andrews \nWhen?  \nFriday\, June 24th \nSaturday\, June 25th \nWhere? \nLecture Room 2\, at St Mary’s College\, University of St Andrews \nWhat’s it about?  \nOur epistemic lives are marked by discoveries\, changes of mind\, epiphanies (if we are lucky)\, and ‘turning points’ – some of them potentially radical in nature. We may call these events epistemic breakthroughs. This philosophical workshop invites participants to think about the nature\, varieties\, and causation of such breakthroughs\, as well as about their role in politics\, society\, and personal life. \nHow do I attend online? \nFor those who would like to attend online\, we will be live-streaming the event. To attend the live-stream\, you must register at the link below (Please note that\, while we may take questions from the online audience\, priority will be given to in person discussion): \n Registration link: \nProgramme \n24th June \n09:00 – 9:30: Arrival and coffee \n09:30 – 11:00    Sanford Goldberg (Northwestern) “What do Speakers Deserve? The Ethics and Epistemology of #BelieveWomen” \nCommentator: Susanne Burri (Universität Konstanz) \n11:15 – 12:45  Fabienne Peter (Warwick) “On Trusting Your Own Political Judgment” \nCommentator: Robert Talisse (Vanderbilt) \n12:45 – 13:45: Lunch \n14:00 – 15:30     Catarina Dutilh Novaes (VU Amsterdam) “Can Arguments Change Minds?” \nCommentator: Jim Weatherall \n15:45 – 17:15 Rachel Fraser (Oxford) “Understanding is Seeing” \nCommentator: Justin Snedegar (St Andrews) \n25th June \n09:00 – 9:30: Arrival and coffee \n09:30 – 11:00   Sophie-Grace Chappell (Open University) “Epiphanies” \nCommentator: Julia Driver (Texas at Austin) \n11:15 – 12:45  Adam Etinson (St Andrews) “Inducing Wonder” \nCommentator: Louise Hanson (Oxford) \n12:45 – 1:45: Lunch \n14:00 – 15:30 C. Thi Nguyen (Utah) “Trust as an Unquestioning Attitude” \nCommentator: Natalie Ashton (Stirling) \n15:45 – 17:15 Cailin O’Connor (UC Irvine) “Interdisciplinarity Can Aid the Spread of Better Methods Between Scientific Communities” \nCommentator: Katharina Bernhard (St Andrews) \n 
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemic-breakthroughs-conference/
LOCATION:Lecture Room 2\, at St Mary’s College
CATEGORIES:Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Epistemic-Breakthroughs-Poster_001.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR