BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.17.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231002T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231002T110000
DTSTAMP:20231105T211905Z
CREATED:20230829T092626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231105T211905Z
UID:10018724-1696239000-1696244400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-4-2/2023-10-02/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T140000
DTSTAMP:20230929T221434Z
CREATED:20230929T221126Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230929T221434Z
UID:10018642-1696334400-1696341600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: Rasmus Overmark (St Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Causes and correlations in the link between language and mindreading \nAbstract: This paper proposes a developmental link between language and mindreading. It puts forward two contrasting ways of interpreting this link. One reads the link as causal. On this reading\, language development contributes to the development of mindreading\, so that mindreading could not develop normally had it not been for language. The other reads the link as correlational. This is the pragmatic view. On this reading language development merely contributes to task performance\, and not mindreading development itself\, because language helps the child to correctly interpret the experimenter’s question in the context of a mindreading task. I find that the causal reading is better supported than the correlational reading on two grounds: First\, sometimes subjects’ development in verbal and non-verbal tasks is mirrored\, indicating only a small role for pragmatic factors. Second\, some experiments avoid pragmatic factors entirely but still show major developmental effects from language. I conclude thus that there is a developmental link between language and mindreading\, and that it is a causal one.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-15/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231003T170000
DTSTAMP:20230829T093454Z
CREATED:20230829T093454Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230829T093454Z
UID:10018656-1696345200-1696352400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar/2023-10-03/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231004T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231004T170000
DTSTAMP:20230921T165548Z
CREATED:20230913T112304Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230921T165548Z
UID:10018670-1696431600-1696438800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Francisca Silva (University of St Andrews and University of Stirling)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Avoid Inconsistency? Two Accounts of Incompatibility \nAbstract: Many take inconsistent states to be not only self-incompatible\, but also to be incompatible with every other state\, whether consistent or inconsistent. On one way of construing such approaches\, two states are incompatible if and only if their fusion is inconsistent (i.e.\, a contradiction can be derived from the resulting state). Having as a background work that has been developed on negation as expressing incompatibility or ruling out\, for instance by Michael Dunn (1993\, 1996)\, Greg Restall (2000) and Franz Berto (2015) (and the latter two together in Berto and Restall (2019))\, as well as work on subtle and blatant inconsistencies by Jago (2014) and Berto and Jago (2019)\, I will explore the prospects of an account of incompatibility according to which two states are incompatible if and only if a contradiction is more easily derivable from the fusion than from any of the parts of the fused states.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-8/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T120000
DTSTAMP:20230915T091550Z
CREATED:20230829T094510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230915T091550Z
UID:10018684-1696500000-1696507200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar: No Meeting
DESCRIPTION:We use the plenary seminar time slot on occasions when we have a meeting of wider interest to the whole Arché community.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar/2023-10-05/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231005T143000
DTSTAMP:20230928T154005Z
CREATED:20230912T134920Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230928T154005Z
UID:10018698-1696510800-1696516200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Nick Kuespert (St Andrews) "I think I got it right"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In this chapter\, I present a novel argument for optimism about moral testimony\, the view that it is permissible to rely on moral testimony when forming one’s moral beliefs. The argument is simple: it is permissible to rely on one’s own moral beliefs formed in the past even if the underlying reasons for the belief are no longer accessible to the agent. But there is no (relevant) difference between relying on one’s past self and other agents – or if there is\, it cuts the wrong way. Recognising that reliance on intrapersonal moral testimony is permissible should thus lead us to conclude that reliance on interpersonal moral testimony is likewise permissible. I explore some consequences for both optimism and pessimism about moral testimony following these considerations and argue that the discussion opens up the possibility for a more nuanced optimism about moral testimony.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-6-4/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231009T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231009T110000
DTSTAMP:20231105T211905Z
CREATED:20230829T092626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231105T211905Z
UID:10018725-1696843800-1696849200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-4-2/2023-10-09/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231010T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231010T140000
DTSTAMP:20231008T052421Z
CREATED:20231008T052239Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231008T052421Z
UID:10018643-1696939200-1696946400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: Daniel Garibay Garcia (St Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Title: The Group Speech Acts Landscape\nAbstract: The objective of this work is to build a map of the views in the group speech acts debate.  My aim is to get a clearer picture of the landscape: find where the different proposals stand in relation to each other (find kinships and disagreements) and\, importantly\, distinguish different aims that theories can have when accounting for speech acts. I follow Fogal\, Harris & Moss’s (2018) landscape of the contemporary views on individual speech acts. The plan is to build an analogous map for the group speech acts views. To correctly map the view\, I argue that we should distinguish between two questions: the performance question\, “What does it take for a group to perform a speech act?” and the force question\, “What distinguishes the force of different group speech acts?”. In answering the first question\, we are interested in knowing when a speech act belongs to (or is rightly attributable to) groups and not to (or not just to) individuals. In the second\, we are interested in answering if what distinguishes group speech acts from each other is the same as with individual speech acts or if the group and individual cases are different in regard to the actions being performed and not just how they are being performed.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-16/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231010T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231010T170000
DTSTAMP:20231009T091447Z
CREATED:20231009T091426Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231009T091447Z
UID:10018657-1696950000-1696957200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar: Nick Allen
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar-4/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231011T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231011T170000
DTSTAMP:20230929T131003Z
CREATED:20230929T130625Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230929T131003Z
UID:10018671-1697036400-1697043600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Hugh Reilly (University of St Andrews and University of Amsterdam)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Topics in Counterfactual Semantics \nAbstract: This paper develops a 2-component update semantics for counterfactual conditionals. It does so by taking basic update semantics and giving it two twists\, one   mereotopicological and one more structural in flavor. This framework\, in conjunction with ideas from rhetorical structure theory RST and segmented discourse representation theory SDRT is interesting in that it can help explain a variety of phenomena associated with counterfactual discourse\, that more basic update semantics struggle with. On this account\, meanings are understood as ways of updating the cognitive states of individuals who want to incorporate the information and subject matter conveyed by them. Counterfactuals (and conditionalities more broadly) are then analyzed compositionally through this lens. One biproduct of this theory\, other than a more fine-grained notion of meaning than in traditional update semantics\, is an attractive account of modal subordination which is modelled as a form of dynamic topic sensitivity.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-17/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231012T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231012T120000
DTSTAMP:20230915T091550Z
CREATED:20230829T094510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230915T091550Z
UID:10018685-1697104800-1697112000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar: No Meeting
DESCRIPTION:We use the plenary seminar time slot on occasions when we have a meeting of wider interest to the whole Arché community.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar/2023-10-12/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231012T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231012T143000
DTSTAMP:20231003T204300Z
CREATED:20231003T204259Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231003T204300Z
UID:10018699-1697115600-1697121000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: No Session
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-6-11/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231016T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231016T110000
DTSTAMP:20231105T211905Z
CREATED:20230829T092626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231105T211905Z
UID:10018726-1697448600-1697454000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-4-2/2023-10-16/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231017T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231017T140000
DTSTAMP:20230829T093055Z
CREATED:20230829T093055Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230829T093055Z
UID:10018644-1697544000-1697551200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar:
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-12/2023-10-17/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231017T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231017T170000
DTSTAMP:20230829T093454Z
CREATED:20230829T093454Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230829T093454Z
UID:10018658-1697554800-1697562000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar/2023-10-17/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231018T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231018T170000
DTSTAMP:20230913T112918Z
CREATED:20230913T112832Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230913T112918Z
UID:10018672-1697641200-1697648400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: NO MEETING
DESCRIPTION:The Metaphysics and Logic Seminar is on break due to Independent Learning Week.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-9/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231019T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231019T120000
DTSTAMP:20230915T091550Z
CREATED:20230829T094510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230915T091550Z
UID:10018686-1697709600-1697716800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar: No Meeting
DESCRIPTION:We use the plenary seminar time slot on occasions when we have a meeting of wider interest to the whole Arché community.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar/2023-10-19/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231019T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231019T143000
DTSTAMP:20230912T135535Z
CREATED:20230912T135534Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230912T135535Z
UID:10018700-1697720400-1697725800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: INDEPENDENT LEARNING WEEK
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-6-9/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231023T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231023T110000
DTSTAMP:20231105T211905Z
CREATED:20230829T092626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231105T211905Z
UID:10018727-1698053400-1698058800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-4-2/2023-10-23/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231024T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231024T140000
DTSTAMP:20231023T115731Z
CREATED:20231018T094903Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231023T115731Z
UID:10018645-1698148800-1698156000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: Reading Session 1
DESCRIPTION:We are planning to have three reading sessions in October and November. We will read Williamson’s ‘Vagueness’ (on 24th Oct\, 31st Oct and 7th Nov). This week\, we will discuss Introduction and Chapter 4 of his book. Justin will lead this session\, providing us with some background on this topic.\n\nAs usual\, we’ll meet at 12-2 pm in room G03 at Edgecliffe. If you would like to join online\, click here.\n\nThe material (accessible via institutional login):\n\nWilliamson\, T. (1994). Vagueness (1st ed.). Routledge. \n\n\n\nhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014264
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-17/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231024T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231024T170000
DTSTAMP:20230829T093454Z
CREATED:20230829T093454Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230829T093454Z
UID:10018659-1698159600-1698166800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar/2023-10-24/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231025T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231025T180000
DTSTAMP:20231005T120533Z
CREATED:20230913T113254Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231005T120533Z
UID:10018673-1698249600-1698256800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: NO MEETING
DESCRIPTION:The Metaphysics and Logic Seminar is on break due to PAFS EDI tutor training.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-and-logic-seminar-11/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231026T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231026T120000
DTSTAMP:20230915T091550Z
CREATED:20230829T094510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230915T091550Z
UID:10018687-1698314400-1698321600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Plenary Seminar: No Meeting
DESCRIPTION:We use the plenary seminar time slot on occasions when we have a meeting of wider interest to the whole Arché community.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/plenary-seminar/2023-10-26/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231026T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231026T143000
DTSTAMP:20231023T132232Z
CREATED:20231018T185938Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231023T132232Z
UID:10018701-1698325200-1698330600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Emilia Wilson (St Andrews) "Testimonial Distortion and Hermeneutical Backfire"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: It has been widely discussed that systematic communicative disablements – such as disbelief\, misinterpretation and unintelligibility – can be unjust. Our communicative practises extend beyond merely sharing information; we also share and contest which questions are worth answering\, which answers suffice\, what parts of our shared body of information matter. This is a central aspect of our social epistemic practices. One way we do this is via perspectival communication in which what one communicates includes an interpretive stance or ‘way of looking’ at the world\, via frames like metaphor and narrative. In this paper\, I consider how perspectival communication may be wrongfully frustrated\, constituting an unjust communicative disablement. I analyse how perspectival communication can be distorted due to dominant ‘mis-interpretive’ resources. I specifically examine the way in which marginalised people’s testimony relating to their own experience of marginalisation\, may be misinterpreted in such a way as to justify and perpetuate that marginalisation thereby ‘backfiring’. Moreover\, I highlight that attempts to counter hermeneutical injustice are especially vulnerable to this form of communicative disablement.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-6-12/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231030T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231030T110000
DTSTAMP:20231105T211905Z
CREATED:20230829T092626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231105T211905Z
UID:10018728-1698658200-1698663600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Ralph Strode\, Treatise on Consequences
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-4-2/2023-10-30/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231031T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231031T140000
DTSTAMP:20231029T113931Z
CREATED:20231027T103403Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231029T113931Z
UID:10018646-1698753600-1698760800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language and Mind Seminar: Reading Session 2
DESCRIPTION:We’ll have the second session of our reading meeting on ‘Vagueness’ (Williamson\, 1994). This week we’ll discuss Chapter 5. Rasmus will be leading the discussion. We’ll meet at 12-2 pm in room G03 at Edgecliffe and online.\n\n \nFor the final session on 7th November\, our provisional plan is to read Chapter 7 and 8.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-seminar-18/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231031T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231031T170000
DTSTAMP:20231027T153009Z
CREATED:20231027T153008Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231027T153009Z
UID:10018660-1698764400-1698771600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:FPST Seminar: Francisca Silva
DESCRIPTION:Title: Grounding Gender in Gender Identity \nAbstract: Contra recent proposals\, for instance by Dembroff (2018) and Jenkins (2023)\, I’ll argue for the Real Gender assumption\, namely for its implication that the reason why one should classify trans people as the gender they identify with is that they are the gender they identify with\, in all contexts. I will argue for this claim by arguing in favour of a “gender-identity first” account of gender (Cosker-Rowland\, 2023). Finally\, I will argue that we should classify people according to the gender they identify with\, regardless of whether the operative gender kinds (Dembroff\, 2018) are just or unjust.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/fpst-seminar-5/
LOCATION:Edgecliffe G03
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR