BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Arche - ECPv6.18.3.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Arche
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Arche
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211004T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211004T110000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145722Z
CREATED:20210628T115246Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145722Z
UID:10017509-1633339800-1633345200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave\, Insolubles
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2021-09-20/2021-10-04/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211004T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211004T170000
DTSTAMP:20210923T165030Z
CREATED:20210628T115741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210923T165030Z
UID:10017552-1633359600-1633366800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics Seminar Greg Restall (University of St Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Worlds: Possible and Impossible \nAbstract: In this talk\, I’ll reflect on the role of worlds—both possible worlds and impossible worlds—both in the semantics of various kinds of languages and logics\, and in broader issues in metaphysics. I will argue that\, given very modest assumptions concerning the role of worlds in semantics\, that any defender of possible worlds in such a role should be equally comfortable with impossible worlds.\n\n\nHowever\, this argument for impossible worlds does not transfer straightforwardly to logically impossible worlds. So\, in the second part of the talk I will consider what we might say\, for (or against) properly logically impossible worlds.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-seminar-5-2021-10-04/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211005T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211005T140000
DTSTAMP:20210916T143620Z
CREATED:20210629T131101Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210916T143620Z
UID:10017624-1633435200-1633442400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language & Mind Seminar: Emma Borg (Reading)
DESCRIPTION:In Defence of Individual Rationality: \n  \nCommon-sense (or folk) psychology holds that (generally) we do what we do for the reasons we have. This common-sense approach is embodied in claims like “I went to the kitchen because I wanted a drink” or “She took a coat because she thought it might rain and hoped to stay dry”. However\, the veracity of these common-sense psychological explanations has been challenged by experimental evidence (primarily from behavioural economics and social psychology) which appears to show that individuals are systematically irrational – that often we do not do what we do because of the reasons we have. Recently\, some of the same experimental evidence has also been used to level a somewhat different challenge at the common-sense view\, arguing that the overarching aim of reasoning is not to deliver better or more logical decisions for individual reasoners\, but to improve group decision making or to protect an individual’s sense of self. This paper explores the range of challenges that experimental work has been taken to raise for the common-sense approach and suggests some potential responses. Overall\, I argue that the experimental evidence should not (currently) lead us to a rejection of individual rationality.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-s1-2021-09-21-2021-10-05/
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211005T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211005T170000
DTSTAMP:20211012T091739Z
CREATED:20210628T155228Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211012T091739Z
UID:10017610-1633446000-1633453200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar - Peter Gärdenfors (Lund University) - Natural Concepts in Humans and in Machines: A Design Perspective
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-4-2021-10-05/
CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211006T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211006T180000
DTSTAMP:20211001T120440Z
CREATED:20210629T133355Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211001T120440Z
UID:10017639-1633536000-1633543200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar: Jonathan Flowers\, 'The Affective Quality of Gender'
DESCRIPTION:The Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar is delighted to welcome Jonathan Flowers\, Professorial Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy & Religion at American University\, who will be delivering a talk titled ‘The Affective Quality of Gender’: \nTitle: The Affective Quality of Gender \nAbstract: \n     While Judith Butler recognizes that identity\, specifically gendered identities\, are established through a stylized repetition of acts\, and Shannon Sullivan connects this stylized repetition of acts to John Dewey’s concept of habit\, this talk will seek to advance upon these theories by presenting the gendered identity established by these habits as one that is affective and qualitative\, by placing both Butler and Sullivan in conversation with Richard Shusterman’s “somaesthetics” and the aesthetic philosophy of John Dewey.  \n     On this view\, the different gendered habits which are taken from or imposed upon us by culture serve to enable an affective perception of the body as not only gendered\, but gendered in a specific way in line with our cultural expectations. This affective perception serves the ground of our immediate judgments of the gender of a body and serves to enable the denotation of bodies as gendered in social space.  \n 
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-2021-10-06/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211007T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211007T120000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145737Z
CREATED:20210628T145602Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145737Z
UID:10017597-1633600800-1633608000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/super-special-seminar-6/2021-10-07/
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211007T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211007T173000
DTSTAMP:20210930T181318Z
CREATED:20210629T142950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210930T181318Z
UID:10017690-1633622400-1633627800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar (joint with CEPPA): Thi Nguyen (Utah) "Value Capture"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: Value capture occurs when an agent enters a social environment which presents external expressions of value — which are often simplified\, standardized\, and quantified — and those external versions come to dominate our reasoning and motivations. Examples include becoming motivated by Twitter Likes and Retweets\, citation rates\, ranked lists of best schools\, and Grade Point Averages. We are vulnerable to value capture because of the competitive advantage that such pre-packaged value expressions have in our reasoning and our communications. But when we internalize such metrics\, we damage our own autonomy. In value capture\, we outsource the process of deliberating on our values. And that outsourcing cuts off one of the key benefits of personal deliberation. When we tailor our values to ourselves\, we can fine-tune them to fit our own particular psychology and place in the world. But in value capture\, we buy our values off the rack.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-3-2021-10-07/
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211011T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211011T110000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145722Z
CREATED:20210628T115246Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145722Z
UID:10017510-1633944600-1633950000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave\, Insolubles
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2021-09-20/2021-10-11/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211011T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211011T170000
DTSTAMP:20211011T032527Z
CREATED:20210628T115741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211011T032527Z
UID:10017553-1633964400-1633971600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics Seminar Jace Snodgrass (University of St Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Properties and Their Parts \nAbstract: I will present some very early ideas on a hyperintensional theory of properties that I am attempting to work out. I will begin my presentation by considering an unlikely area of inquiry: the mereology of material objects. I will offer a framework for thinking about two distinct types of parthood for objects. One type leads to an unstructured conception of objects; the other leads to a structured conception of objects. I will then suggest that there is a roughly analogous framework for thinking about parthood for properties. Once this framework for properties is in place\, I will turn my attention to the theory of properties\, what I call ‘the theory of property embodiment’. \nThe theory of property embodiment draws its inspiration from a theory of objects that endorses a structured conception of objects. The theory of objects that I have in mind is Kit Fine’s theory of embodiment. For what Fine has to say about objects serves as a sort of blueprint to what I would like to say about properties. Whether or not I can properly extend Fine’s theory in the way that I would like is something that I want to explore during our seminar. \n 
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-seminar-5-2021-10-11/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211012T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211012T140000
DTSTAMP:20211006T154904Z
CREATED:20210629T131101Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211006T154904Z
UID:10017625-1634040000-1634047200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language & Mind Seminar: Daniel Garibay Garcia (St Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Authority and Group Assertion\n\nWe commonly attribute assertions to groups like companies and government institutions\, and we want to hold them accountable for their assertions. Intuitively\, we don’t attribute those assertions to the individuals performing them\, but to the groups. The question is: what kind of speech act is group assertion and how does it relate to individual assertion? Is it reducible to de second? In this work\, I defend an account based on having the authority to assert on behalf of the group. I take support from Lackey’s (2018) account of group assertion. I argue that her account has some important problems and I try to give a more succinct account of group assertion.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-s1-2021-09-21-2021-10-12/
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211012T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211012T170000
DTSTAMP:20211012T095514Z
CREATED:20210628T155228Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211012T095514Z
UID:10017611-1634050800-1634058000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar - Luciano Floridi (University of Oxford) - On Design and the Logic of Information
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-4-2021-10-12/
CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211013T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211013T180000
DTSTAMP:20211008T131401Z
CREATED:20210629T133355Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211008T131401Z
UID:10017640-1634140800-1634148000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar
DESCRIPTION:For our next seminar we will be having our second session on the theme of ‘Dangerous Speech\, Free Speech and Cancel Culture”. Derek Ball will be presenting a work in progress titled ‘A Limited\, Metasemantic Defense of Cancel Culture‘. \nTitle:“A Limited\, Metasemantic Defense of Cancel Culture”\nAbstract: \nHume wrote\, “We cannot form to ourselves a just idea of the taste of a pine-apple\, without having actually tasted it”.  Putnam claimed that brains in vats could not entertain thoughts about the external world\, since thinking such thoughts requires genuine contact with the world one is thinking about.  These are claims about how one’s circumstances constrain what one can think — what contents one can entertain.  This talk aims to develop the notion of a content constraint\, and to relate this notion to issues of free speech.  A leading idea is that free speech requires adequate conceptual and linguistic resources\, and that this requirement can motivate actions designed to avoid content constraints (including constraints that might be caused by the actions of other speakers).  On plausible metasemantic assumptions\, there could be cases in which deplatforming or cancelling are appropriate responses to speakers whose speech threatens to create constraints for others; but care is needed to determine exactly what kinds of cases might justify these responses.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-2021-10-13/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211014T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211014T120000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145737Z
CREATED:20210628T145602Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145737Z
UID:10017598-1634205600-1634212800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/super-special-seminar-6/2021-10-14/
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211014T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211014T143000
DTSTAMP:20211010T205705Z
CREATED:20210629T142950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211010T205705Z
UID:10017691-1634216400-1634221800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Nick Kuespert (St Andrews) "Aims of Moral Inquiry"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: What should the interaction between non-experts and experts look like when it comes to moral inquiry? In this talk\, I discuss this interaction from both perspectives. In the first part\, I argue that whether non-experts should treat experts as authorities or advisors depends on the aim of moral inquiry which in turn varies with context. I propose a hybrid model: by default\, the aim of moral inquiry is moral understanding and non-experts should therefore treat moral experts as advisors. If\, however\, moral understanding is unavailable or only attainable at high risk\, moral knowledge becomes the aim of moral inquiry and non-experts should treat moral experts as authorities. In the second part\, I argue that we should be careful not to conceive of moral experts as completely analogous to non-moral experts. In particular\, we can expect that many moral experts will be those negatively affected by injustices. This creates special procedural obligations for non-experts in their pursuit of moral expertise.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-3-2021-10-14/
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211018T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211018T110000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145722Z
CREATED:20210628T115246Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145722Z
UID:10017511-1634549400-1634554800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave\, Insolubles
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2021-09-20/2021-10-18/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211018T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211018T170000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145706Z
CREATED:20210628T115741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145706Z
UID:10017554-1634569200-1634576400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-seminar-5-2021-10-18/2021-10-18/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211019T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211019T140000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145649Z
CREATED:20210629T131101Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145649Z
UID:10017626-1634644800-1634652000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language & Mind Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-s1-2021-09-21-2021-10-19/2021-10-19/
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211019T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211019T170000
DTSTAMP:20211012T092052Z
CREATED:20210628T155228Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211012T092052Z
UID:10017612-1634655600-1634662800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar - Shelley Lynn Tremain (Biopolitical Philosophy) - Engineering (The Apparatus of) Disability
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-4-2021-10-19/
CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211021T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211021T120000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145737Z
CREATED:20210628T145602Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145737Z
UID:10017599-1634810400-1634817600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/super-special-seminar-6/2021-10-21/
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211021T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211021T143000
DTSTAMP:20211014T102053Z
CREATED:20210629T142950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211014T102053Z
UID:10017692-1634821200-1634826600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Lara Jost (St Andrews) "Epistemic Exclusion: Why We Shouldn’t Treat Members of Oppressed Groups like We Treat Conspiracy Theorists"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In this work-in-progress\, I build from Iris Marion Young’s notions of inclusion and exclusion and Kristie Dotson’s framework of epistemic oppression\, to show how some traditional views about what counts as a good source of justification can participate to internal epistemic exclusion\, which contributes to second order epistemic oppression. Whilst theories of justification often seem detached and independent from social structures\, I aim to cast doubt over the apparent fairness of the process of engagement with one another\, as some epistemic agents are subjected to internal exclusion\, even though they are reasonable and engage with the rest of the group. This leads me to argue that members of oppressed groups who use affective experience as a source of justification are unduly excluded from epistemic exchanges. In contrast\, I explain why conspiracy theorists who argue on the basis of their affective experience should remain duly excluded.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-3-2021-10-21/
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211025T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211025T110000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145722Z
CREATED:20210628T115246Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145722Z
UID:10017512-1635154200-1635159600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave\, Insolubles
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/medieval-logic-seminar-2021-09-20/2021-10-25/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211025T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211025T170000
DTSTAMP:20211025T134623Z
CREATED:20210628T115741Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211025T134623Z
UID:10017555-1635174000-1635181200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Metaphysics Seminar Anthi Solaki (University of Amsterdam)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Impossible Worlds in Dynamic Epistemic Logic \nAbstract: Epistemic Logic\, as a spinoff of normal modal logics\, suffers from the problem of logical omniscience: its agents are perfect reasoners with unlimited deductive power. We argue that\, even from a normative point of view\, this modelling is inadequate for it sets requirements that cannot be actually attained according to solid empirical evidence. We therefore design a non-standard dynamic framework\, making use of (a) impossible worlds (not closed under logical consequence)\, and (b) quantitative components capturing the agent’s cognitive capacity and the cognitive costs of inference rules with respect to certain resources (e.g. memory\, time). These ingredients allow us to avoid problematic logical closure principles and at the same time account for the agent’s bounded reasoning steps. Moreover\, such impossible-worlds models induce awareness-like structures\, contributing towards a unifying overview of the omniscience literature and the extraction of useful formal results. We finally show that this approach can be generalized in order to encompass the dynamics of higher-order reasoning\, communication\, group deliberation\, and thus do justice to multiple facets of human reasoning.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/metaphysics-seminar-5-2021-10-25/
LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, St Andrews\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211026T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211026T140000
DTSTAMP:20211021T171607Z
CREATED:20210629T131101Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211021T171607Z
UID:10017627-1635249600-1635256800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Language & Mind Seminar: Robert Brown (St Andrews)
DESCRIPTION:Elisabeth Pacherie’s “Self-Agency”
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/language-and-mind-s1-2021-09-21-2021-10-26/
CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211026T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211026T170000
DTSTAMP:20211012T095755Z
CREATED:20210628T155228Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211012T095755Z
UID:10017613-1635260400-1635267600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar - Rachel Sterken (Hong Kong University) [Joint work] - On Retweeting
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-4-2021-10-26/
CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211027T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211027T180000
DTSTAMP:20211015T140755Z
CREATED:20210629T133355Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211015T140755Z
UID:10017641-1635350400-1635357600@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar: Nick Allen
DESCRIPTION:For our third seminar on the theme of Dangerous Speech\, Free Speech and Cancel Culture Nick Allen will be giving a work-in-progress presentation titled ‘Context-Collapsed Contributory Injustice: the Dangers of Misappropriating Speech Online‘.\n\nTitle: Context-Collapsed Contributory Injustice: the Dangers of Misappropriating Speech Online \n\n\n\nAbstract: The misappropriation of marginalised communities’ terminology by the wider public is a particularly modern and nefarious form of discriminatory practice\, fuelled increasingly by social media. Using these terms outside their original context warps their meaning\, decreasing the intelligibility of the experiences of the marginalised agents who use them when attempting to express themselves both within their community and without. \nI intend to give an analysis of this phenomena\, with the expectation that understanding it better will provide a crucial step in combatting it. To this end I will argue it can best be understood as a specialised form of what Kristie Dotson calls ‘contributory injustice’combined with a specific consequence of what Boyd and Marwick call ‘context collapse’. The result is a novel phenomena I label ‘Context-Collapsed Contributory Injustice’ or ‘CC.CI’. \nIn addition\, I will argue that CC.CI causes a novel from of what Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’\, which is demarcated by its ability to reintroduce conceptual lacunas by undermining existing hermeneutical resources. \n\n\nThroughout\, I will focus on the example case of the misappropriation of the concept ‘woke’ as it is used on black twitter (which is\, roughly\, the subsection of twitter users who are black and tweet with the intended audience of other black users). \n 
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-2021-10-27/
CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arché Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211028T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211028T120000
DTSTAMP:20221019T145737Z
CREATED:20210628T145602Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221019T145737Z
UID:10017600-1635415200-1635422400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/super-special-seminar-6/2021-10-28/
CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211028T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211028T143000
DTSTAMP:20211011T105255Z
CREATED:20210629T142950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211011T105255Z
UID:10017693-1635426000-1635431400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Frederik Andersen (St Andrews) "Logical Akrasia"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: The aim of this paper is two-fold. First\, it introduces the concept logical akrasia (by analogy to epistemic akrasia). Second\, it discusses how logical akrasia relates to the standards of epistemic rationality\, and in particular\, how logical akrasia poses a challenge to the tenability of the controversial fixed point thesis.
URL:https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/arche/event/epistemology-seminar-3-2021-10-28/
CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR