If the download does not begin automatically, please click here

Development and Uses of Upper-division Conceptual Assessments

Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research - Focused Collection on Upper-Division PER (submitted)

Bethany R. Wilcox1, Marcos D. Caballero2, Charles Baily3, Homeyra Sadaghiani4, Stephanie V. Chasteen1, Qing X. Ryan1 and Steven J. Pollock1

1Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0390, USA
2Department of Physics and Astronomy & CREATE for STEM Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
3School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS Scotland, UK
4Department of Physics and Astronomy, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, USA

Abstract: The use of validated conceptual assessments alongside more standard course exams has become standard practice for the introductory courses in many physics departments. These assessments provide a more standard measure of certain learning goals, allowing for comparisons of student learning across instructors, semesters, and institutions. Researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder have developed several similar assessments designed to target the more advanced physics content of upper-division classical mechanics, electrostatics, quantum mechanics, and electrodynamics. Here, we synthesize the existing research on our upper-division assessments and discuss some of the barriers and challenges associated with developing, validating, and implementing these assessments as well as some of the strategies we have used to overcome these barriers.

Keywords: physics education research, electrostatics, conceptual assessment, CUE, multiple-choice.
PACS: 01.40.Fk, 01.40.G-, 01.40.gf, 01.50.Kw