Marking Scale - Taught Postgraduates

Within the School of History all work is assessed on a scale of 1-20 with intervals of 0.5. Module outcomes are reported using the same scale but with intervals of 0.1. The assessment criteria set out below are not comprehensive, but are intended to provide guidance in interpreting grades and improving the quality of assessed work. Students should bear in mind that presentation is an important element of assessment and that failure to adhere to the guidelines set out in the School of History Style Sheet will be penalised.

Outstanding Distinction 20.0
MLitt distinction: work attracting marks in this bracket will be distinguished in most or all of the following ways: originality of thought or interpretation; independence of judgement; wide-ranging reading, beyond that recommended and often in more than one language (where appropriate); intelligent engagement with primary sources; historiographical awareness; breadth, clarity and rigour of argument and structure; clarity and elegance of style; unusual and apt examples; outstanding work in this category should be of near-publishable quality.
19.5
19.0
Clear Distinction 18.5
18.0
Borderline Distinction 17.5
17.0
16.5
     
MLitt Pass 16.0
MLitt Pass: work in this category will be distinguished in most of the
following ways: clarity, breadth and rigour of argument and structure; coverage of recommended reading and some use of additional titles; intelligent engagement with primary sources; historiographical awareness; well chosen examples
15.5
15.0
14.5
14.0
13.5
     
Postgraduate Diploma 13.0
Postgraduate Diploma Pass: work in this category is not of sufficient merit to qualify for the degree of MLitt, but does meet the required standard for a Postgraduate Diploma; it will have some of the following features: strong evidence of knowledge and understanding, but limitations in clarity and rigour of argument and structure; incomplete coverage of recommended reading; restricted and unsophisticated use of primary sources; weaknesses of style; failure to address the title set.
12.5
12.0
11.5
11.0
10.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
     
Fail 6.5
Work with very serious deficiencies that fall below Postgraduate Diploma standard, failing to address the literature with the seriousness required and with an inadequate grasp of the subject matter and of historical analysis.
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
     
Unclassifiable 0 No acceptable work presented.